Request the
FREE Decision of the Week

MORE INFORMATION

The Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit’s (BAFFC) goal is to improve and facilitate the administration of justice in the federal courts within the Fifth Circuit. Thousands of attorneys committed to raising the standards of proficiency and integrity in federal practice have joined our Association.

As an attorney in good standing with the bar of any American state or territory, you are eligible to become a member of the Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit.

GET THE LATEST COMMENTARY ON 5TH CIRCUIT DECISIONS AND APPEALS

United States v. Salcedo No. 18-40359

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/18/18-40359-CR0.pdf

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

(PER CURIAM).

AFFIRMED. (May 10, 2019).

A jury convicted Spencer Salcedo on two counts of using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity and two counts of using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly attempt to transfer obscene matter to a minor under the age of 16. Salcedo appealed his conviction on the counts involving transfer of obscene material in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1470, arguing both that the image at issue was not obscene and that he did not intend to transfer the image to any minor under the age of 16. The Fifth Circuit rejects Salcedo’s arguments. The Court first holds that the photograph Salcedo sent to an undercover officer was a patently offensive, lewd exhibition of the genitals. Therefore, the material was obscene, as required under § 1470. The Court further holds that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s finding that Salcedo intended to transfer the image to minors under the age of 16. The Court acknowledges that the same evidence may support other, less incriminating conclusions, but explains that it may not override the jury’s sound judgment based solely on the fact that there are alternate interpretations.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Nelva Gonzales Ramos).
Attorney for Appellant – Evan Gray Howze, Houston, TX
Attorney for Appellee – John A. Reed, Houston, TX

 

GET THE COMMENTARY STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Receive full decision commentary daily in your inbox
for only $95 a year!